USPTO serial 85604478
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott R. Cox
Scott R. Cox Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman, P.S.C.500 West Jefferson Street, Suite 2100Louisville, KY 40202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications hardware and software for remotely monitoring and controlling battery-operated and electric household sump pumps and sewage pumps via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Internet based monitoring and control services relating to battery-operated and electric household sump pumps and sewage pumps | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 31, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 22, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2012 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |