Drawing for CORE PRACTICE

USPTO serial 85604755

CORE PRACTICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORE PRACTICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine Lebron-Dykeman

CHRISTINE LEBRON-DYKEMAN MCKEE, VOORHEES & SEASE, P.L.C.801 GRAND AVE STE 3200DES MOINES, IA 50309-8009UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable electronic publications, namely, assessment tests, score reports, statistical reports, research reports, and teaching materials in the fields of educationACTIVE—
016Publications and printed matter, namely, assessment tests, score reports, statistical reports, research reports, and teaching materials in the field of educationACTIVE—
035Business management services, namely, collecting, processing, analyzing and benchmarking school system practices to facilitate the operation of a school systemACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, conducting evaluations and assessments for the purpose of evaluating school system practices and student achievement; educational and training services, namely, providing classes, seminars, conferences, workshops, and custom courses in the field of education; providing information in the field of education; consulting in the field of K-12 educational systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 24, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 2, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 5, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 16, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 28, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance