USPTO serial 85607546
TITTL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TITTL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
marina del rey, CA
marina del rey, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah A. Feinblum
Deborah A. Feinblum VENABLE LLP2049 Century Park EastSuite 2100Los Angeles, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Audio and video recording services; Entertainment services by a musical artist and producer, namely, musical composition for others and production of musical sound recordings; Entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the field of music; Entertainment services, namely, dance events by a recording artist; Production of sound and music video recordings; Providing an Internet website portal in the field of music; Record master production; Record mastering; Record production; Recording studio services; Recording studios | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 16, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |