Drawing for FASTACT

USPTO serial 85608173

FASTACT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHUO, EMILY M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FASTACT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Philip M. Davison

5959 LAS COLINAS BLVDIRVING, TX 75039-4202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Component of a mechanized system for use in gas wells, namely, plunger used to remove water from gas wellsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 18, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 17, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 2, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 21, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 12, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 23, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 23, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 23, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 28, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 28, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 8, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 19, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2012GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 28, 2012GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 28, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 21, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 19, 2012PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 3, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 1, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 18, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 18, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 17, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance