USPTO serial 85608635
IHEALTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHINER, MARK W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IHEALTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountain View, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Communication by electronic computer terminals; Communication services, namely, transmission of voice, audio, visual images and data by telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, the Internet, information services networks and data networks; Communications services, namely, transmitting streamed sound and audiovisual recordings via the Internet; Computer aided transmission of information and images; Electronic exchange of medical records across a nationwide health information network; Electronic mail and messaging services; Electronic mail services; Electronic mail services for data and voice; Electronic store-and-forward messaging; Electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; Electronic transmission of mail and messages; Electronic transmission of messages; Electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; Electronic, electric, and digital transmission of voice, data, images, signals, and messages; Information transmission services via digital networks; Instant messaging services; Interactive delivery of video over digital networks; Message sending and receiving services; Message sending via a website; Message sending, receiving and forwarding; On-line document delivery via a global computer network; Peer-to-peer network computer services, namely, electronic transmission of audio, video and other data and documents among computers; Providing a web site for synchronous and asynchronous communication and for connection of physicians with their patients regardless of medical organization or geographic location; Providing access to an electronic exchange of medical records across a nationwide health information network; Providing multiple use access to global computer information networks for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information; Providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network; Providing on-line chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the field of general interest; Providing voice communication services via the Internet; Streaming of audio, visual and audiovisual material via a global computer network; Streaming of audiovisual material on the Internet; Telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics and video by means of broadband optical or wireless networks; Telecommunication services, namely, providing e-mail notification alerts via the internet; Telecommunication services, namely, providing electronic message alerts via the internet notifying individuals of a changed status or condition of a sensing device in a security system; Transmission and distribution of data or audio visual images via a global computer network or the internet; Transmission and reception of database information via the telecommunication network; Transmission of information in the audiovisual field; Transmission of information via computers connected to the same telematic network; Wireless communications services, namely, transmission of graphics to mobile telephones; Wireless digital messaging services; Wireless electronic transmission of voice signals, data, facsimiles, images and informations; Wireless telephone telecommunications services, namely, wireless mobile telephone calling plans | ACTIVE | Jan 4, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2013 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |