Drawing for HIGH PERFORMANCE COSMETICS

USPTO serial 85609921

HIGH PERFORMANCE COSMETICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4231702Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2012
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with HIGH PERFORMANCE COSMETICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel I. Ackerman

Daniel I. Ackerman Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP410 Seventeenth Street, Suite 2200Denver, CO 80202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics and make-upSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDApr 20, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2019C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Oct 23, 2017REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 22, 2015TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Apr 22, 2015CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 22, 2015CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Feb 13, 2014PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 23, 2012R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Sep 17, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 17, 2012CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Aug 16, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 30, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 30, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 10, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 18, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2012GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2012GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2012EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Jun 14, 2012CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jun 14, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 1, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance