USPTO serial 85610062
DUNDEE GOODMAN INVESTMENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SERVANCE, RENEE L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DUNDEE GOODMAN INVESTMENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Midge M. Hyman
MIDGE M. HYMAN Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.114 West 47th StreetNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL ASSET MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, THIRD PARTY AND PROPRIETARY ASSET MANAGEMENT FOCUSING ON REAL ESTATE, INFRASTRUCTURE, ENERGY, RESOURCES AND AGRICULTURE SECTORS; CAPITAL INVESTMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, DIRECT AND INDIRECT INVESTMENT IN, AND OWNERSHIP OF, REAL ESTATE, INFRASTRUCTURE, ENERGY, RESOURCES, AGRICULTURE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSETS AND COMPANIES; INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES, NAMELY, FULL-SERVICE SECURITIES BROKERING, FINANCIAL PLANNING AND INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES; CAPITAL MARKETS SERVICES, NAMELY, INVESTMENT BANKING SERVICES AND THE SALE OF SECURITIES THROUGH THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OFFERINGS AND FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES RELATING TO MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS, DIVESTITURES, RESTRUCTURINGS AND STOCK EXCHANGE LISTINGS; INVESTMENT BROKERAGE, NAMELY, THE SELLING, PURCHASING AND TRADING OF EQUITY, EQUITY-RELATED AND FIXED INCOME SECURITIES ON A PROPRIETARY BASIS AND ON BEHALF OF RETAIL AND INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS; INVESTMENT RESEARCH SERVICES, NAMELY, THE PREPARATION OF RESEARCH REPORTS AND OPINIONS FOR INVESTORS AND INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS; DEVELOPMENT OF INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS AND FUNDS FOR OTHERS; BROKERAGE OF FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |