USPTO serial 85611241
DATACENTER CLARITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4797538Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 25, 2015
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DATACENTER CLARITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Maya Heat Transfer Technologies Ltd.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Maya Heat Transfer Technologies Ltd.
Maya Heat Transfer Technologies Ltd.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Maya Heat Transfer Technologies Ltd.
Maya Heat Transfer Technologies Ltd.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Maya Heat Transfer Technologies Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Robert LeBlanc
J. Robert LeBlanc Haynes and Boone, LLP2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700Dallas, TX 75219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in monitoring and managing the lifecycle of physical datacenter infrastructure assets through implementation of specialized software, hardware and sensors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Maya Heat Transfer Technologies Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Maya Heat Transfer Technologies Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Maya Heat Transfer Technologies Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DATACENTER CLARITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 7, 2015 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 7, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 7, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2012 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |