USPTO serial 85611249
SHARED CONSCIOUSNESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHARED CONSCIOUSNESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Spokane Valley, WA
Spokane Valley, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Brent Kenady
D. Brent Kenady Wells St. John P.S.601 W. 1st AvenueSuite 1300Spokane, WA 99201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Amplifier for wireless communications; Antennas for wireless communications apparatus; Apparatus for transmission of communication; Broadband wireless equipment, namely, telecommunications base station equipment for cellular and fixed networking and communications applications; Communication hubs; Communication software for providing access to the Internet; Communications computers; Communications headsets for use with communication radios, intercom systems, or other communications network transceivers; Communications servers; Computer graphics software; Computer hardware for communicating audio, video and data between computers via a global computer network, wide-area computer networks, and peer-to-peer computer networks; Computer software for communicating with users of hand-held computers; Computer software for the databasing, visualization, manipulation, virtual reality immersion and integration of geographic information with on-line member communities; Day and night vision systems primarily comprising day and night sensors, day and night cameras, power sources, communication means, monitors and operating software; Electronic and optical communications instruments and components, namely, digital transmitters; Electronic and optical communications instruments and components, namely, optical data links; Electronic and optical communications instruments and components, namely, optical receivers; Electronic and optical communications instruments and components, namely, optical transceivers; Electronic and optical communications instruments and components, namely, optical transmitters; Electronic communications systems comprised of computer hardware and software for the transmission of data between two points; Electronic devices for animal locating and tracking programmed to use global positioning systems (GPS) and cellular communications; Electronic devices used to locate lost articles employing the global positioning system or cellular communication networks; Electronic devices, namely, radio frequency repeaters used in long range communication for tracking and monitoring energy usage; Electronic educational apparatus, namely, communication blocks that manipulate and convey information electronically based on their arrangement and are used for cognitive development in disciplines such as counting, spelling or quantitative reasoning; Microphones for communication devices; Near field communication (NFC) technology-enabled readers; Optical communications systems comprised of optical and electronic hardware and computer software for the transmission of data between two points; Satellite and microwave communications apparatus to transmit communications from a vehicle to another vehicle, or from a vehicle to a satellite | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 21, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 26, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 6, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |