USPTO serial 85611457
LUMICONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUMICONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Hills, CA
NORTH HILLS, CA
NORTH HILLS, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grant T. Langton
Grant T. Langton Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.350 South Grand Ave., Suite 2600Two California PlazaLos Angeles, CA 90071-3406Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys, games and playthings, namely, action figures and accessories therefor; stuffed toy animals; baby's multiple activity toys; toy bakeware and cookware; balloons; toy banks; bath toys; bathtub toys; inflatable bath toys; ride-on toys; inflatable ride-on toys, equipment sold as a unit for playing card games; toy cars; dolls, beanbag dolls; paper dolls, rag dolls, soft sculpture dolls, doll accessories and playsets therefor, namely, doll cases, doll clothing; doll house furnishings, doll costumes; stuffed toys; checker sets; chess sets; children's play cosmetics; child's multiple activity toys; toy construction blocks; infant's action crib toys; flying discs; hand-held units for playing electronic games other than those adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; electronic game equipment with a watch function; electronically operated toy motor vehicles; board games and game equipment sold as a unit for playing board games; card games; manipulative games; parlor games; role-playing games; stand-alone video parlor computer game machines; action type target games; rocking horses; jigsaw puzzles; kites; manipulative puzzles; paper face masks; toy model train sets; toy model vehicles and related accessories sold as a unit; electronically operated toy motor vehicles; electronic battery operated action toys; toy magic tricks, noisemakers; toy whistles; party favors in the nature of small toys; toy cap pistols; plush toys; soft sculpture plush toys; manipulative puzzles, namely, three dimensional cube type puzzles; toy record player for playing tunes and cassettes and discs therefor; skateboards; ice skates; toy roller skates; toy in-line skates and accessories, namely, knee, wrist, and elbow protective pads for skating; water squirting toys; teddy bears; wind up walking toys; wind-up toys; ride-on toys; toy trucks; twirling batons; toy zip guns; gymnastic apparatus for children; balls, namely, playground balls, foam balls; swimming floats for recreational use, namely, pool rings; inflatable swimming pools for recreational use; kickboard floatation devices for recreational use; skipping ropes; jump ropes; snow sleds for recreational use; swim fins; inflatable and buoyant bath toys; swimming and ride-on toys; musical toys; latex squeeze toys; playing cards; coin operated and non coin operated stand-alone video output game machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 13, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 4, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |