Drawing for UNLEASHING CONTENT'S POTENTIAL

USPTO serial 85611857

UNLEASHING CONTENT'S POTENTIAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNLEASHING CONTENT'S POTENTIAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Hughes

MICHAEL J. HUGHES IPLO INTELLECUTAL PROPERTY LAW OFFICE4100 MOORPARK AVE STE 203SAN JOSE, CA 95117-1708UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Integrated tracking and management of commercial transactions on a global computer network; Providing electronic tracking of intellectual and industrial property assets to othersACTIVE—
042Advanced product research in the field of artificial intelligence; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use by publishers to tag digital content to track and prevent unauthorized copying and distribution; Application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; Computer hardware and software design; Computer hardware development; Computer programming and software design; Computer software development in the field of authentication and tracking of digital contact to protect against counterfeiting, tampering and diversion; Research in the field of intelligence and security technologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 2, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 30, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 5, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 29, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 17, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 17, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2013GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 17, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 3, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance