Drawing for IMAX HFR

USPTO serial 85612272

IMAX HFR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMAX HFR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William H. Brewster

WILLIAM H. BREWSTER KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP1100 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 2800ATLANTA, GA 30309-4528UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Movie projectors; hardware for modifications for movie projectors designed to allow them to process increased screen image temporal resolution mediaACTIVE—
041Production and post-production editing services in the field of motion picture images designed to increase screen image temporal resolutionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 8, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 30, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 27, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 19, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 23, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 22, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 21, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 25, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 25, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 1, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 6, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 29, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 18, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 25, 2012GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 25, 2012GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 25, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 17, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 7, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 3, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance