USPTO serial 85612815
CORD LOCK AWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4554106Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 24, 2014
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CORD LOCK AWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pendleton, Salford M66, GB
Pendleton, Salford M66, GB
Pendleton, Salford M66, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Lerner
MARK LERNER SATTERLEE STEPHENS BURKE & BURKE LLP230 PARK AVE RM 1130NEW YORK, NY 10169-0079UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Curtain tie-backs in the nature of non-textile curtain holders; cord clips, not of metal for curtains, blinds and window coverings; non -metallic fasteners, namely ties, for holding curtains, blinds and window coverings in place; non-textile curtain ties used for curtains, blinds and window coverings; non-electric cord connectors used for curtains, blinds and window coverings; cord management devices , namely, straps and magnetic attachment points for curtains, blinds and window coverings; magnetic attachment points for cord management devices used for curtains, blinds and window coverings; Decorative curtain accessories, namely hooks, rails, rings, rods, and curtain tiebacks in the nature of non-textile curtain holders, non-textile holdbacks and non-textile curtain embraces used for curtains, blinds and window coverings; non-textile curtain holders for use in securing curtains, blinds and window coverings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 022 | Tie cords used for curtains, blinds and window coverings; Non-metallic cord straps used for curtains, blinds and window coverings; Non-electric Cords used for curtains, blinds and window coverings; non-electric cords made of fibre, textile or metal used for curtains, blinds and window coverings; sash cords; cords made of plastic materials for curtains, blinds and window coverings; devices, namely, covers for securing all types of cords and cables; devices, namely, covers for holding curtain cords; Non-metal child safety devices, namely, string and cord winders for use on blinds, curtains, drapes, window coverings and door coverings; cord ties used for curtains, blinds and window coverings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 026 | Decorative curtain accessories, namely, cords for curtains, blinds and window coverings; decorative twisted cords | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Speedy Products Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Speedy Products Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Speedy Products Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named CORD LOCK AWAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 8, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 19, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |