USPTO serial 85612902
RUGGED LOGIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCPHERSON RAYBURN, SHAVELL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RUGGED LOGIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew F. Reish
ANDREW F. REISH Andrew Reish & Associates, PLLC12355 Sunrise Valley DriveSuite 650Reston, VA 20191Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Mobile communication systems, namely, voice communication systems, namely, analog systems and Voice-Over-Internet-Protocol (VoIP) systems consisting of analog telephone adapters, analog telephones, VoIP phone software applications, and VoIP telephones; data/networking systems, namely, land mobile radio, power over Ethernet, wired Ethernet, wireless, SATCOM connectivity, and cellular WAN systems consisting of satellite modems, satellite terminals, wireless broadband radios, two-way radios, wired Ethernet transceivers, wireless radios, networking routers, and Ethernet switches; electronic encryption units; performance packaging, namely, rigid environmentally sealed shock and vibration absorbing enclosures specially adapted to hold and protect electronic mobile communications systems from harmful environmental conditions; user interfaces for electrotechnical and electronic devices; integrated power, namely, uninterruptible power supplies, wideband AC and DC current converters, and smart electrical power distribution units; computer software for computer setup assistance, monitoring and control of electronic devices; mobile electrical power integration systems consisting of solar power converters, battery chargers, generator converters, multi-output power supplies, and power supply connectors for alternative supply of electrical power to electronic devices; ruggedized customized containers specially adapted for the protective storage of electronic devices; and automated systems consisting of optical sensors, acoustic sensors, environmental sensors, electrical controllers, electric motors, actuators, and wireless communications electronics, namely, radios, mobile phones, and modems in the fields of robotics and sensing technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design for others; design and development of automated systems for others in the fields of robotics and sensing technology; engineering analysis of product development for others in the fields of thermal analysis, flow analysis, stress/displacement analysis, RF link budgets and reverse engineering; and product design for others in the fields of system design, RF component integration, circuit design, controller design, actuator integration, sensor integration, mechanical design, firmware/software design, testing, manufacturing design, testing, manufacturing design, and documentation development of system manuals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 16, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |