Drawing for RAYWARE

USPTO serial 85613039

RAYWARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAYWARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Brown

MICHAEL J BROWN MICHAEL J BROWN LAW OFFICE LLC354 EISENHOWER PARKWAYPLAZA ILIVINGSTON, NJ 07039-1048

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Storage jars for household use made from china, glass, plastic, porcelain or ceramic; non-electric tea pots made from china, glass, plastic, porcelain or ceramic; ceramic coasters; all the foregoing not relating to sports or a sports team, league, mascot or stadiumACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 17, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 31, 2015TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS
Jan 31, 2015OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jan 31, 2015OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
May 2, 2014OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Dec 5, 2013ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Nov 20, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 5, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 5, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 16, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Sep 28, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 27, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 16, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 12, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 11, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 11, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Mar 13, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Mar 13, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 13, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 8, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 7, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 7, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 22, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 8, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
May 7, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 4, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance