Drawing for CAPE COD WINERY

USPTO serial 85613401

CAPE COD WINERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARER, ZACHARY R
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAPE COD WINERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Milton Oliver

MILTON OLIVER OLIVER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LLCPO BOX 790COTUIT, MA 02635-0790UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed novelty wine labelsACTIVEJan 1, 1997
021Wine glassesACTIVEJan 1, 1997
033Cooking wine; Fruit wine; Grape wine; Port wines; Red wine; Red wines; Sparkling wines; Still wines; Strawberry wine; Sweet wines; Table wines; White wine; Wine; Wines; Wines and fortified wines; Wines and sparkling winesACTIVEJan 1, 1997
041Entertainment services, namely, wine and food tastings; Entertainment services, namely, wine tastingsACTIVEJan 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 28, 2014MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 24, 2014ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 24, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 20, 2014EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 17, 2013GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2013GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 8, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 8, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 4, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2013PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Sep 30, 2013PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Sep 30, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 28, 2013PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Aug 20, 2013APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 7, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 7, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 6, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 8, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 3, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 13, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 4, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance