USPTO serial 85613424
EVERGRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVERGRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay Begler
JAY BEGLER NIESAR & VESTAL LLP90 NEW MONTGOMERY ST FL 9SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-4504UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software in the nature of digital albums or other electronic media formats intended to memorialize life moments, which allows the system and/or its users the ability to capture, produce, modify, edit, store, access, upload, download, synchronize, index, tag, manage, blog, display, stream, share, link and provide electronic media or information via computer over other communications networks | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Providing use of online temporary non-downloadable software in the nature of digital albums or other electronic media formats intended to memorialize life moments, which gives users the ability to capture, produce, edit, store, upload, download, synchronize, index, tag, manage, display, share and provide electronic media or information via computer over other communications networks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 17, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 17, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 17, 2017 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2014 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |