Drawing for SENSORY TABLESCAPING

USPTO serial 85613595

SENSORY TABLESCAPING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENSORY TABLESCAPING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert L. Brewer

ROBERT L. BREWER BASS, BERRY & SIMS PLC150 3RD AVE S STE 2800NASHVILLE, TN 37201-2017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016A series of books in the field of interior design, wedding planning, decorating, gardening, lifestyle, fashion and entertaining; cookbooks; magazines and magazine and newspaper columns in the field of interior design, wedding planning, decorating, fashion, gardening, lifestyle and entertainingACTIVE—
042Providing information in the fields of interior design, home accessorizing in the nature of decorating, and interior decoratingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 5, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 19, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 19, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 19, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 10, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 16, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 13, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 12, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2013ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 17, 2013PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 5, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 5, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 5, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 24, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 22, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 9, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 8, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance