USPTO serial 85614531
T.I.T.T.L.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with T.I.T.T.L.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah A. Feinblum
Deborah A. Feinblum Venable LLP2049 Century Park EastSuite 2100Los Angeles, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and marketing services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others; Advertising and promotion services and related consulting; Advertising services, namely, promoting and marketing the goods and services of others through all public communication means; Advertising text publication services; Advice in the field of business management and marketing; Advice in the running of establishments as franchises; An interactive web site for users to review and rate internet content, people, companies, products and/or services utilizing a software application to award points whereby web site users are eligible to exchange points earned for promotional items consisting of coupons, rebates, discounts or special offerings on goods and/or service provided by web site sponsors; Promoting public interest in education, recognition, career advancement, and leadership for elite managers and executives in corporations and professional service firms | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment information; Entertainment services by a musical artist and producer, namely, musical composition for others and production of musical sound recordings; Entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the field of music; Entertainment services, namely, cheerleading; Entertainment services, namely, conducting contests; Entertainment services, namely, providing a website at which the general public can receive advice from an individual or entity concerning happiness, such advice being for entertainment purposes only; Entertainment services, namely, providing advice and information for music, video and film concept and script development | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ESTATE OF BART TROW C/O DANIEL C. LORENZEN
- Other trademarks owned by Trow, Bart D
- Other trademarks owned by Trow, Bart D
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named T.I.T.T.L.
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |