USPTO serial 85614608
GOODMAN PARTNERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HISER, CHARLES
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOODMAN PARTNERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Midge M. Hyman
MIDGE M. HYMAN Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.114 West 47th StreetNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROMOTION OF THE INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS OF OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | FINANCIAL ASSET MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, THIRD PARTY AND PROPRIETARY ASSET MANAGEMENT FOCUSING ON REAL ESTATE, INFRASTRUCTURE, ENERGY, RESOURCES AND AGRICULTURE SECTORS; CAPITAL INVESTMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, DIRECT AND INDIRECT INVESTMENT IN, AND OWNERSHIP OF, REAL ESTATE, INFRASTRUCTURE, ENERGY, RESOURCES, AGRICULTURE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSETS AND COMPANIES; INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES, NAMELY, FULL-SERVICE SECURITIES BROKERING, FINANCIAL PLANNING AND INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES; CAPITAL MARKETS SERVICES, NAMELY, INVESTMENT BANKING SERVICES AND THE SALE OF SECURITIES THROUGH THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OFFERINGS AND FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES RELATING TO MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS, DIVESTITURES, RESTRUCTURINGS AND STOCK EXCHANGE LISTINGS; INVESTMENT BROKERAGE, NAMELY, THE SELLING, PURCHASING AND TRADING OF EQUITY, EQUITY-RELATED AND FIXED INCOME SECURITIES ON A PROPRIETARY BASIS AND ON BEHALF OF RETAIL AND INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS; INVESTMENT RESEARCH SERVICES, NAMELY, THE PREPARATION OF RESEARCH REPORTS AND OPINIONS FOR INVESTORS AND INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS; DEVELOPMENT OF FINANCIAL INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS AND FUNDS FOR OTHERS; BROKERAGE OF FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 21, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |