USPTO serial 85614786
STAINPROTECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACFARLANE, JAMES W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STAINPROTECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WT Hoofddorp 2132, NL
WT Hoofddorp 2132, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Lerner
MARK LERNER SATTERLEE STEPHENS BURKE & BURKE LLP230 PARK AVE RM 1130NEW YORK, NY 10169-0079UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical products, namely, water softener salt; chemicals, namely, decalcifying and descaling agents for industrial purposes; chemical preparations to protect against tarnishing of glassware, porcelain, earthenware, crockery and other kitchenware; chemical preparations to protect against discoloration, stains, oxidation, scaling and corrosion of glassware, porcelain, earthenware, crockery and kitchenware | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | All purpose toilet and bathroom cleaning preparations; all-purpose cleaners with deodorizing and disinfectant properties; drain opening preparations; scouring liquids; lime, rust and stain removers for toilets, bath tubs, sinks, tiles and floors; bleaching preparations and other substances, namely, detergents for laundry use; dry cleaning preparations, namely, detergent and laundry protectors for dry cleaners; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations, namely, household cleaning preparations, carpet cleaning preparations; detergents; soaps; laundry additives, namely, fabric softeners, bleach, stain preventing preparations; stain removing preparations; combination cleaner freshener and deodorizer for machine dishwashers; decalcifying and descaling preparations for household use | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | All purpose disinfecting preparations; all purpose disinfectant spray; sanitizing preparations for household use; germicides; air deodorizers and sanitizers for bathrooms and toilets; room deodorizers; preparations for neutralizing odors in fabric and in the home | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Reckitt Benckiser N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Reckitt Benckiser N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named STAINPROTECT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 29, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 13, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 7, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 29, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 4, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |