USPTO serial 85614814
NEW YORK FASHION LAW CENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANOR, THOMAS M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEW YORK FASHION LAW CENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles Colman
CHARLES COLMAN CHARLES COLMAN LAW, PLLC30 W 70TH ST APT 5DNEW YORK, NY 10023-4640UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing live and on-line teaching in the field of fashion law; Education services, namely, providing on-line information in the field of fashion law; Education services, namely, providing instruction in the field of fashion law; Educational services, namely, conducting seminars in the field of fashion law; Educational services, namely, conducting courses in the field of fashion law and distribution of educational materials in connection therewith; Educational services, namely, providing on-line instruction in the field of fashion law; Production and distribution of videos in the field of law; Providing continuing legal education courses; Providing education courses in the field of fashion law offered through online, non-downloadable videos and instructor assistance; Providing educational information in the academic field of fashion law for the purpose of academic study | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Fashion consulting services; Fashion information; Legal consultation services; Legal services; Legal services, namely, intellectual property consulting services in the field of identification, strategy, analytics, and invention; Legal services, namely, preparation of applications for trademark registration; Legal services, namely, providing customized documentation, information, counseling, advice and consultation services in all areas of fashion; News reporting and expert legal commentary services in the field of legal news; On-site legal services; Online news reporting and expert legal commentary services in the field of legal news; Providing an on-line interactive database featuring legal information; Providing assistance in the prosecution of trademark applications; Providing customized legal information, counseling, and advice, and litigation services in the field of fashion; Providing fashion information; Providing information about fashion; Providing information in the field of intellectual property legal services ; Providing information in the field of workplace law, legal practices and legal policies via the Internet; Providing news and information in the field of fashion; Providing on-line information in the field of intellectual property legal services; Provision of a web site featuring information on fashion | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |