USPTO serial 85615449
PAYVIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRAZIER, TAMARA G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PAYVIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
N. Christopher Norton
N. Christopher Norton, Esq. ARENT FOX LLP1717K STREET, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5342UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Customer support services via internet and telephone, namely, responding to customers inquiries for others in the field of processing electronic and mobile device payments; business monitoring services, namely, review and monitoring of promotional materials for adherence to consumer protection principles and revenue assurance; monitoring of media content and promotions for mobile and other telecommunications devices, namely, business consulting services relating to processing electronic and mobile device payments; providing advice to others regarding fee structure for electronic payments made via computers, mobile phones and other telecommunications devices based on analysis of advertising response; business data analytics and business intelligence services for merchants utilizing mobile payments and utility carrier billing | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Electronic payment, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data; providing infrastructure, system, network and service for payment by mobile telecommunications devices, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options using a mobile device as a payment apparatus; providing consumer protection and security in financial transactions, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options; providing electronic processing of electronic funds transfer, ACH, credit card, debit card, electronic check and electronic payments | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing services that permit payment processing by means of telecommunications transmissions over public telecommunications networks; providing electronic transmission of credit card transaction data and electronic payment data via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Customer computer technical support services via internet and telephone, namely, live help desk services for mobile device-related commerce web applications; providing consumer protection and security in financial transactions, namely, design and development of electronic data security systems; providing security for transactions in mobile and other telecommunications networks, namely, secure transaction services, specifically, providing security and anonymity for electronically transmitted credit card transactions; customer support services via internet and telephone in the nature of computer technology support services, namely, help desk services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Monitoring of payment advice, authentications and offers for mobile and other telecommunications devices, namely, monitoring regulatory compliance with advertising and promotions laws and regulations; providing security for transactions in mobile and other telecommunications networks, namely, data authentication, specifically, authentication, issuance, and validation of digital certificates; providing security for transactions in mobile and other telecommunications networks, namely, data authentication, specifically, providing user authentication services in e-commerce transactions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by mTrust, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PAYVIA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PAYVIA, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named PAYVIA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |