USPTO serial 85615913
HERCULES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASSIDY, COLLEEN MULCRONE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HERCULES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond Rundelli
RAYMOND RUNDELLI CALFEE, HALTER & GRISWOLD LLP1405 E 6TH STCLEVELAND, OH 44114-1600UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Stove cement in the nature of contact cement for use on stoves, plastic pipe cement in the nature of contact cement, and antifreeze for protecting boilers, pipe lines and fresh water systems, liquid chemical leak detector, chemical sealants for use on hot water heater systems and boilers to penetrate and seal the material | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | Coatings in the nature of heat-proof finishes for exterior use on a variety of substrates, and paints | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | Cleaning compounds for the hands, toilets, tubs, tile piping, stoves, water heaters, and tools; hand cleaner; preparation for cleaning fuel oil systems; drain opener | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Penetrating, lubricating and cutting oil, and pipe joint tape lubricant | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Root-destroying preparation for sewer lines in the nature of root killers for killing roots in sewer lines | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | Metal bolts for securing toilet bowls | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Wax gaskets for use in plumbing, caulking and packing compounds, and pipe joint compound in tape form; pipe joint compound in paste form; non-adhesive plumber's putty | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HCC Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named HERCULES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2013 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2012 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |