Drawing for ICE CHOCOLATE

USPTO serial 85615934

ICE CHOCOLATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ICE CHOCOLATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth Shieldkret

6720 EXETER STFOREST HILLS, NY 11375-4151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
026Hairpieces, add-in and add-on hair accessories constructed primarily of synthetic and/or human hairACTIVEApr 16, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 1, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 1, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 18, 2014EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 29, 2014RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jul 29, 2014CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 22, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 7, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 7, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 6, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 5, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2013MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 13, 2013RGRRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2013APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 30, 2013APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 24, 2013ERRSTEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT—
Oct 4, 2013ERRSTEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT—
Sep 30, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 25, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 7, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance