USPTO serial 85616440
TOYS TO LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOYS TO LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott Major
SCOTT MAJOR ILLEN WHITE ZELANO & BRANIGAN PC2200 CLARENDON BOULEVARDSUITE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Entertainment Products in the nature of computer game software, computer game software and related instruction manual sold together as a unit, interactive video game programs, computer game cartridges, computer game discs, downloadable computer game software, computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones, downloadable electronic games via the Internet and wireless devices, computer game software downloadable from a global computer network, interactive video game consisting of a cartridge or DVD sold as a unit with an RFID reader, motion picture films and films for television featuring children's entertainment, downloadable motion pictures and television shows featuring children's entertainment, audio and video recordings in all media featuring programming for children | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Entertainment products in the nature of action figures and accessories therefor, party favors in the nature of small toys, squeeze toys, stuffed toys, talking toys, toy vehicles, toy figures, toy banks, toy trucks, wind-up toys, plush toys, protective carrying cases and holders specially adapted for collectable toy figures, arcade game machines, puzzles, card games, board games, costume masks, Christmas tree ornaments and decorations, collectable toy figures, collectable toy figures having radio frequency identification (RFID) chips or tags, action figures having RFID chips or tags, playsets for collectable toy figures, protective carrying cases specially adapted for handheld video games, paper party hats, plastic party hats, balloons, hand held units for playing video games other than those adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor, handheld unit for playing electronic video games, stand alone video game machines, arcade games, coin-operated video games, electric action toys, card game utilizing RFID chips or tags within the cards for playing electronic games other than those adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor, toy candy dispensers, amusement game machines, arcade crane game machines, baseball bats, baseballs, baseball mitts, basketballs, basketball hoops, bath toys, inflatable bath toys, battery operated action toys, handballs, beach balls, bean bag dolls, bobble head dolls, trading card games, chess games, checker sets, Christmas stockings, toy construction sets, construction toys, egg decorating kits, footballs, amusement devices, namely, bounce houses in the nature of an air inflated cushion in an air inflated structure, inflatable pools for recreational use. inflatable toys, kites, kaleidoscopes, pachinkos, pet toys, pinball games, piñatas, radio controlled toy vehicles, playing cards, rideable toy vehicles, skateboards, snow globes, soccer balls, swim fins, swim floats for recreational use, paddle boards, water toys, water squirting toys, yo-yos, gaming headsets for use in playing video games, and game controllers for computer games | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line interactive games; Entertainment services, namely, providing virtual environments in which users can interact for recreational, leisure or entertainment purposes; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line, non-downloadable virtual customizable worlds for use in virtual environments created for entertainment purposes; Entertainment services, namely, organization of social gaming, and augmented reality gaming services; Entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring non-downloadable publications in the field of children's stories and fictional characters; Entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring games and puzzles and downloadable printable materials in connection therewith, namely, printable coloring pages, board games, dioramas, and paper crafts; Entertainment services, namely, providing online news and information in the field of computer games and computer enhancements for games; Entertainment services, namely, providing online augmented reality games; Entertainment services, namely, providing a website for organizing, planning and executing events between computer game players and interest groups; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line, non-downloadable virtual currency and items for use in virtual environments created for entertainment purposes; Entertainment services, namely, the provision of on-going movies and television shows in the field of children's stories and fictional characters delivered via and by television, cable, satellite, audio and video media and electronic means | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 1, 2014 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 20, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 23, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |