Drawing for RODEXPERT

USPTO serial 85617276

RODEXPERT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RODEXPERT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Regina Corrigan

Regina Corrigan GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLP421 - 7th Avenue SW1600CALGARY, ALBERTA, T2P4K9

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing use of a web-based software application that is used in the energy sector to calculate the optimum surface and downhole design and configuration of sucker rod pumping systems to achieve desired oil production ratesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 1, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 5, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 5, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 5, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 13, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 7, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 15, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2014GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2014GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2014CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 2, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 25, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2013GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2013GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2013CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 25, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 25, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 25, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 24, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 11, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 8, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance