Drawing for COKI

USPTO serial 85619035

COKI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with COKI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Bottled water; Drinking water with vitamins; Drinking waters; Flavored enhanced water; Flavored waters; Mineral water; Sparkling water; Water beveragesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2018MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 27, 2018ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 27, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 26, 2018OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 5, 2016PC.DPETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED—
May 3, 2016APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 14, 2016TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2015COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2015OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 2, 2015OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 6, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 16, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 28, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 28, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 6, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 10, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 10, 2015COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 8, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 5, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 10, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 8, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 11, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 19, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 19, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 15, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 13, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 13, 2013LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 12, 2013LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Aug 31, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 29, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 14, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 11, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance