Drawing for L LIGHTSPEED CHINA PARTNERS

USPTO serial 85620512

L LIGHTSPEED CHINA PARTNERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with L LIGHTSPEED CHINA PARTNERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynn M. Humphreys

LYNN M. HUMPHREYS MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET ST FL 30SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultation servicesACTIVE—
036Venture capital investment services; venture capital services, namely, providing financing to emerging and start-up companies; private equity investment services; private equity services, namely, financing services, structuring and participating in equity and debt financings, sourcing investments, identification of investors, advising on fund raising materials, identifying potential acquisitions and acquisition targets, advising on IPO planning and execution; investment banking services; raising and managing funds, namely, raising funds from institutional and individual investors and providing fund management services; capital investment services; publicly traded securities investment management services; financial management and administration of funds in the nature of investment funds and funds involving publicly traded securitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 9, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 4, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 10, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2014EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Mar 1, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Feb 28, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 19, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 3, 2013EAREEARLY EXTENSION OF USE REFUSED—
Oct 3, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 3, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 30, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 30, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 30, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 30, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 12, 2013NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 15, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 11, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 10, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 24, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 21, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 15, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 4, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 15, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 12, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance