Drawing for FAIR OAKS FARMS

USPTO serial 85623047

FAIR OAKS FARMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FAIR OAKS FARMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas A. Cherry

DOUGLAS A CHERRY SHUMAKER LOOP & KENDRICK LLP240 SOUTH PINEAPPLE AVENUESARASOTA, FL 34236 6717UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Beverages consisting principally of milk; Beverages having a milk base; Butter; Cheese; Cheese and cracker combinations; Chocolate milk; Coconut milk powder; Coconut-based beverage used as a milk substitute; Condensed milk; Dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Dairy-based beverages; Dairy-based snack foods excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Dried milk for food; Evaporated milk; Fermented milk; Food package combinations consisting primarily of cheese, meat and/or processed fruit; Half and half; Jellies, jams; Milk; Milk based beverages containing fruit juice; Milk beverages containing fruits; Milk beverages with high milk content; Milk curd; Milk powder; Milk shakes; Milk solids; Milk-based beverage containing coffee; Milk-based beverages containing milk concentrates, vegetable oil and added nutrients; Milk-based beverages with chocolate; Milk-based energy drinks; Powdered milk; Protein milk; Strawberry milk; Vanilla milk; Yogurt; Yogurt drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2014TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jul 24, 2014OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 24, 2014OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jul 10, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 13, 2013OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 5, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 1, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 6, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 25, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 15, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance