Drawing for SHARPEVISION

USPTO serial 85623727

SHARPEVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHARPEVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Heather N. Schmidt

HEATHER N SCHMIDT1280 HARRISON STUNIT 153SEATTLE, WA 98109

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Laser vision correction services; Laser vision surgery services; Medical services, namely, ophthalmology, routine eye care, and laser and incisional ophthalmic surgery services; Ophthalmology services; Skin treatment, namely, the injection of dermal fillers to reduce the appearance of facial fine lines; Treatment of eye diseases and conditionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2014MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 31, 2014ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 31, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 14, 2014EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 23, 2013GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2013GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 1, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 1, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 30, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2013DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Apr 2, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 1, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 1, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 1, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 11, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 17, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 15, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance