USPTO serial 85624078
FRUGAL KITCHENS & CABINETS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAVEESHVAR, JUHI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRUGAL KITCHENS & CABINETS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Peachtree City, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa Orme
LANCE I HOCHHAUSER LINDSEY LAW FIRM PC2002 COMMERCE DRIVE NSUITE 300PEACHTREE CITY, GA 30269Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation of kitchen appliances; Installation of kitchen cabinets | ACTIVE | Oct 20, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |