Drawing for PREVENTION AS A SERVICE (PAAS)

USPTO serial 85624583

PREVENTION AS A SERVICE (PAAS)

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUYKENDALL, LYNDSEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PREVENTION AS A SERVICE (PAAS)?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin P. Ferguson

Kevin P. Ferguson Motorola Solutions, Inc.500 West Monroe Street, 43rd FloorChicago, IL 60661UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Cloud computing featuring software for use in video surveillance and for adaptive analytics of video surveillance; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in video surveillance and adaptive analytics of video surveillance; Providing temporary use of a web-based software application for use in video surveillance and adaptive analytics of video surveillance; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in video surveillance and adaptive analytics of video surveillanceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 5, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 5, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
May 5, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 5, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 6, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 30, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 2, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 30, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 30, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 31, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 29, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 29, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 30, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 4, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 15, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 15, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 1, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 1, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 22, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2012GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Oct 16, 2012GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Oct 16, 2012CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Oct 11, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 11, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 11, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 10, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2012GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2012GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2012EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Sep 7, 2012CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Sep 5, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 17, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance