USPTO serial 85624754
MEETINGS, EVOLVED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEETINGS, EVOLVED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Markham, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joanne Gillespie
91 LICHFIELD ROADMARKHAM, ONTARIO, L3R0W9CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable web-based and intranet software for use in information management that allows users to schedule, manage and participate in online meetings, with access to government data, documents, images and voting records | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |