USPTO serial 85625977
FUNBOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRAZIER, TAMARA G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUNBOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Zeynel Karcioglu
Zeynel Karcioglu Jacobs & Burleigh LLP1290 Avenue of the Americas, 30th FlNew York, NY 10104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | video broadcasting services over the Internet; video broadcasting services over the Internet in the field of film, motion picture, tv shows, sports, documentaries, fashion, music, news, reality-based, comedy, drama, variety, on-going series; Broadcast of cable television programs; Broadcasting of television programs; Broadcasting of video programming over the Internet; Broadcasting of cable tv, tv, satellite, radio, internet, mobile, on-demand, theatrical, video programs; Broadcasting programs via a global computer network; Broadcasting services and provision of telecommunication access to films and television programs provided via a video-on-demand service; Broadcasting services and provision of telecommunication access to video and audio content provided via a video-on-demand service via the Internet; Cable television broadcasting; Cable television transmission; Interactive delivery of video over digital networks; Internet broadcasting services; Internet protocol television (IPTV) transmission services; Mobile media services in the nature of electronic transmission of entertainment media content; Pay-per-view television transmission services; Satellite television broadcasting; Streaming of audiovisual material via a global computer network; Streaming of audiovisual material on the Internet; Subscription television broadcasting; Video broadcasting and transmission services via the Internet, featuring films and movies; Video on demand transmissions; Video streaming services via the Internet, featuring independent films and movies; Video transmission over digital networks; Video-on-demand transmission services via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Creating and developing concepts for television programs; Digital video, and multimedia publishing services; Distribution of motion picture films; Distribution of television programming to cable television systems; Distribution of television programs for others; Electronic games services provided by means of the internet; Entertainment services, namely, displaying a series of films; Entertainment services, namely, multimedia production services; Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring video and prose presentations featuring sports, documentaries, fashion, music, news, reality-based, comedy, drama subject matters; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-going television programs in the field of sports, documentaries, fashion, music, news, reality-based, comedy, drama via a global computer network; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-going webisodes featuring sports, documentaries, fashion, music, news, reality-based, comedy, drama via a global computer network; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games; Entertainment services, namely, providing online electronic games; Entertainment services, namely, providing online video games; Entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer games; Entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable electronic games; Entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable interactive games; Entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable video games; Film and video production; Film distribution; Media production services, namely, video and film production; Production and distribution of television shows and movies; Production of cable television programs; Provision of non-downloadable films and movies via a video-on-demand service; Provision of non-downloadable films and television programs via a video-on-demand service; Rental and computerized on-line rental services featuring interactive software and hardware home entertainment and consumer electronics in the nature of motion pictures, films, movies in a variety of genres; Rental of films; Rental of pre-recorded videos that may be downloaded from an Internet web site; Television programming | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 11, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 12, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 11, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 21, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | INOA | AMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 30, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 11, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 16, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |