Drawing for M M2 PERFORMANCE

USPTO serial 85626230

M M2 PERFORMANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M M2 PERFORMANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bin Li

Bin Li LAW OFFICES OF BIN LI AND ASSOCIATES730 N. Diamond Bar BlvdCITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91765UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Automobile parts, namely, exhaust systems comprised of exhaust pipes, mufflers for enginesABANDONEDSep 1, 2009
012Automobile suspension components, namely, springs and armsABANDONEDSep 1, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2013MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 12, 2013ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 9, 2013EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 26, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 25, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 15, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 12, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 12, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 18, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 12, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 21, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 18, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance