USPTO serial 85627345
SEISMIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEISMIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Davidsville, PA
Davidsville, PA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, in the form of an application for mobile computing devices and an application programming interface, to enable the uploading, downloading, posting, playing, displaying, tagging, blogging, viewing and sharing of fitness and sports related content in electronic form over an online communications network | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing a website for entertainment purposes where users can view and post fitness-themed videos, photographs, personal profiles, comments, and reviews featuring fitness-related activities and workouts; Entertainment services, namely, providing information, videos, and photos in the fields of fitness, sports and exercise via a website; online publication of articles in the fields of fitness, nutrition, sports and exercise; entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts in the fields of fitness, nutrition, sports and exercise; educational services, namely, conducting lectures, seminars and workshops in the fields of fitness, nutrition, sports and exercise; entertainment in the nature of competitions in the field of fitness; entertainment in the nature of sports competitions; fitness training | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 6, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 2, 2016 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 7, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |