Drawing for EVZDROP

USPTO serial 85627367

EVZDROP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVZDROP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffery A. Handelman

Jeffery A. Handelman Brinks Hofer Gilson & LioneP.O. Box 10395Chicago, IL 60610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009A software application accessible via the Internet or mobile device, and social media platform designed to connect people and placesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2014MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 18, 2014ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 17, 2014EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 23, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 3, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 30, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 3, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 3, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 3, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 7, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 7, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 6, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 22, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance