USPTO serial 85627381
THE ADDICTION TREATMENT EXPERTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4553457Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2014
- Examiner
- KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE ADDICTION TREATMENT EXPERTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore A. Breiner
THEODORE A BREINER BREINER & BREINER LLC115 NORTH HENRY STREETALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2903UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Hospital services and treatment of alcoholism and drug addiction | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 9, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |