Drawing for VICTOR

USPTO serial 85628515

VICTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VICTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barbara A. Friedman

Barbara A. Friedman EDELL, SHAPIRO & FINNAN, LLC9801 Washingtonian BoulevardSuite 750Gaithersburg, MD 20878

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Metal welding flux; soldering fluxACTIVE—
006Consumables for cutting and welding, namely, welding wire, solid wire, flux-cored wire, metal welding rods, filler rods of metal, common metal powders, welding flux, metal exothermic cutting rods; metal conductor tubes, storage tanks of metal; metal oxygen cylinders sold empty; soldering wire of metal; brazing rods of metalACTIVE—
007Welding, brazing, soldering, gouging, cleaning, scouring, plasma cutting, flame cutting, and other metal treatment machines and apparatus, namely, electric arc cutting apparatus, electric arc torches, cutting torches, welding torches, underwater welding torches, underwater cutting torches, gas operated plumbing torches, gas operated blow torches, gas operated welding guns, valves as machine components for welding and cutting equipment, welding generators, welding electrodes, flash back arrestors as machine components for welding and cutting torches; parts and fittings for welding machines, namely, welding tips, welding nozzles, welding valves, welding hoses and welding manifolds, excluding lathesACTIVE—
009Protective gear for welding, namely, welding masks and hand shields; welding helmets; safety goggles; protective eyewear; protective gloves for welding; protective head guards for welding; gas flow meters; power supplies for welding and cutting equipment; power inverters for arc welders; built-in voltage sensors and surge protectors for plasma cutters and welders; gas gauges; oxygen regulators; solderers' helmets; safety helmets; safety accessories for use in connection with apparatus and machines for cutting, soldering, welding, brazing, gouging, cleaning, scouring, and other heat treatment of metals, namely, welding safety glasses, welding goggles, welding gloves, welding jackets, welding shirts; oxygen concentration monitors, not for medical use; oxygen electrodes, not for medical use; oxygen sensors, not for medical use; oxygen transvasing apparatus, namely, oxygen regulators; oxygen regulators for welding and soldering equipmentACTIVE—
011Regulating accessories for gas apparatus; regulating accessories for water or gas apparatus and pipes; regulating accessories for gas pipes; gas regulators; gas regulators for welding and soldering equipment; welding fume extraction installations, namely, industrial air filtering machines for the control, removal, and filtration of welding fumes from the airACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 13, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 13, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 28, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 3, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 3, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 20, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 27, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 27, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 27, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 14, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 16, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 7, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 7, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 7, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 8, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 6, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 6, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 6, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 12, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 23, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 28, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 3, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2013DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Oct 22, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 16, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 16, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 16, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 16, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 16, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 16, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 19, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 18, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 4, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 24, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 23, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 21, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance