USPTO serial 85629040
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Jaffe
MICHAEL A. JAFFE KUSNER & JAFFE6150 PARKLAND BLVD STE 105MAYFIELD HEIGHTS, OH 44124-4103UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Rocks or concrete crushing machines and apparatus consisting of high-voltage generators and power units for use in mining and construction; loading and unloading machines; waste crushing machines; shredders being machines for industrial use | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | explosives; and explosives in the nature of capsules for use in mining and construction | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Demolition services, namely, demolition of concrete buildings; construction, namely, building construction; construction consultancy; repair or maintenance of mining machines and apparatus; repair or maintenance of construction machines and apparatus; repair or maintenance of loading-unloading machines and apparatus; repair or maintenance of waste crushing machines and apparatus; repair or maintenance of shredders being machines for industrial use and their parts and fittings; rental of mining extraction machines and apparatus; rental of construction machines and apparatus; rental of shredders being machines for industrial use and their parts and fittings; explosive blasting operations, namely, blast hole drilling and blasting for use in construction and mining extraction; none of the foregoing for use in the oil and gas industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Demolition services, not buildings | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 5, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |