USPTO serial 85629455
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol A. Genis
CAROL A. GENIS K&L GATES LLPPO BOX 1135CHICAGO, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Edible nuts, namely, candied nuts, flavored nuts, processed nuts, roasted nuts; jams; spreads, namely, fruit spreads, peanut spreads | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Chocolate and chocolate confectioneries; candy; almond confectionery, sugar confectionery, peanut confectionery; edible nuts, namely, chocolate covered nuts, sugared nuts, candy covered nuts; coffee beans; teas; biscuits, cookies, pastries; mixes for bakery goods, cakes, muffins, and brownies; jams, spreads, namely, cocoa spreads, spread containing chocolate and nuts, spreads consisting of emulsified biscuits or cookies | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring candy; retail store services featuring candies and confectionaries, edible nuts, coffee and tea, biscuits, cookies, pastries, mixes for bakery goods, cakes, muffins, brownies, cocktail mixes, jams, spreads; Retail store services and distributorship services in the field of candy dispensers and holders; Franchise services, namely, providing technical aid and assistance in the establishment and operation of franchised candy store and treat shops | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |