USPTO serial 85630528
ATII
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ATII?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lexington, KY
Lexington, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Carrithers
David W. Carrithers CARRITHERS LAW OFFICE, PLLC120 W. Stephen Foster Ave., Suite 101Bardstown, KY 40004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Material treatment services for the custom manufacture for others of the following goods, namely, metal alloys and metal alloys armor; custom manufacture of metal alloys featuring the shaping of metal alloys | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Laboratory research in the field of chemistry, material treatment, and metallurgy; product development, design engineering in the field of metallurgy; and engineering consulting services, providing scientific physical research and testing relating to metal alloys for commercial entities; engineering research in the field of metallurgy; product development, product testing, technical verifying of designs and custom design for others, all related to metal alloys for earth and space applications, including drafting specifications for manufacture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 29, 2013 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |