Drawing for BISHOP

USPTO serial 85630766

BISHOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BISHOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew J. Gray IV

ANDREW J. GRAY IV MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP2 PALO ALTO SQPALO ALTO, CA 94306-2122UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising services, namely, dissemination of advertising for others over the Internet and other communications networksACTIVE—
038Transmission and streaming of digital media and advertising for others over the Internet and other communications networks; communications services, namely, the transmission of data in the nature of digital media and/or advertising over the Internet or other communications networkACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software used to facilitate the tracking, targeting, and distribution of advertising; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software to enable uploading, posting, displaying, tagging, blogging, and sharing digital media and information over the Internet and communications networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 11, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 21, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 21, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 24, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 22, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 22, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 22, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 27, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 7, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 17, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 26, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 24, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 24, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 24, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance