Drawing for XTRA

USPTO serial 85630964

XTRA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HWANG, JOHN C B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XTRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. Schuman

David J. Schuman CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.500 Charles Ewing BoulevardLaw DepartmentEwing, NJ 08628

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Candles, perfumed candles, scented candles, tallow candles, candle torchesACTIVE—
011Air freshening, air purification, air deodorizing and fragrance dispensing units for automotive, household, commercial and institutional use, consisting of an electrically powered fan, an air filter, and a replaceable air freshening fragrance cartridge; electric dispensers for air fresheners and deodorizers to be plugged into wall outlets; portable electric fans; humidifiers for household, industrial and commercial purposes; air purifiers for automotive, household, industrial and commercial purposes; air cleaners for automotive, household, commercial and institutional use; filters for humidifiers; air filters for air conditioning units; air filters for HVAC units; air filter machines for automotive, household, commercial and institutional use and replacement filters for such air filter machines; water filters for domestic, industrial and commercial purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 31, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 25, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 1, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 18, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 29, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 22, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 17, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 17, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 11, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 9, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 9, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 25, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 1, 2013ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jan 21, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2012CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2012APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 8, 2012EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 14, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 26, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 25, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 24, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance