USPTO serial 85631462
IDEA ELEVATION PLATFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IDEA ELEVATION PLATFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Farmington Hills, MI
Farmington Hills, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeremy D. Bisdorf
JEREMY D BISDORF JAFFE RAITT HEUER & WEISS PC201 S MAIN ST STE 300ANN ARBOR, MI 48104-2176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business advice and information relating to loans, finance and capital; Business services, namely, matching potential private investors with entrepreneurs needing funding; Information, advisory and consultancy services relating to business and management or business administration, including such services provided on line or via the internet; Promotion of business opportunities; Providing a website featuring a searchable database of investors for use by inventors; Providing a website featuring company profiles entrepreneurs can use to attract venture capital; Providing a website for connecting sellers with buyers; Providing financial indices of select securities to enable consumers to evaluate investments and market trends in the securities market | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | Advice relating to investments; Brokerage services for capital investments; Business finance procurement services; Equity capital investment; Facilitating and arranging for the financing of debt and equity investments on a micro level; Financial advisory and consultancy services relating to micro credits, micro finance and energy products; Financial services, namely, raising debt and equity capital for others; Financing and loan services; Financing of loans; Financing services; Information, advisory, consultancy and research services relating to finance and investments; Loan financing; Project financing; Providing financial services with respect to securities and other financial instruments and products, namely, providing financial market news and commentary; Providing financial services with respect to securities and other financial instruments and products, namely, trading of and investments in securities and financial instruments and products for others; Providing information in the field of finance; Providing venture capital, development capital, private equity and investment funding; Providing working capital; Providing working capital financing to small businesses and small business owners; Venture capital financing; Venture capital services, namely, providing financing to emerging and start-up companies | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |