Drawing for IDENTITYLINK

USPTO serial 85632185

IDENTITYLINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IDENTITYLINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kelly J. Kubasta

Kelly J. Kubasta Ferguson, Braswell & Fraser, PC2500 Dallas ParkwaySuite 501Plano, TX 75093

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software to manage, analyze, retrieve, monitor, maintain, report on, structure, model, forecast, present and display data and information from various databases; Computer software that provides real-time, integrated business management intelligence by combining information from various databases and presenting it in an easy-to-understand user interface; Computer software to automate data warehousingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 14, 2013MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Feb 14, 2013ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Feb 13, 2013EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Feb 11, 2013ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jan 24, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 24, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 24, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 23, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 23, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 23, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 23, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 30, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
May 29, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 25, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance