Drawing for THE VIRTUAL VOYAGER

USPTO serial 85632474

THE VIRTUAL VOYAGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE VIRTUAL VOYAGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raj Abhyanker

RAJ ABHYANKER RAJ ABHYANKER, P.C.1580 W EL CAMINO REAL STE 8MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94040-2462UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring travel and cruisesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 9, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 14, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 14, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 24, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 10, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 30, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 26, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance