Drawing for MYSYLVAN

USPTO serial 85635610

MYSYLVAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, WILLIAM D
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MYSYLVAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK HARRISON

MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-4385UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software in the nature of mobile applications for providing online classes and tutoring programs offered at the Pre-K through grade 12 level and at the entry level college course level, for providing a multimedia content library consisting of publisher course curriculum materials, learning tools, and assessments content for use by instructors of classes in the k-12 educational market, and for providing tutoring and instruction, educational assessments, diagnostic reading, math, science, social studies, and foreign languages assessments, student progress monitoring, preparation for standardized testing, and preparation for school entrance exams; Pre-recorded electronic and digital media featuring tutoring and instruction in K-12 subjects, educational assessments, diagnostic reading, math, science, social studies, and foreign languages assessments, student progress monitoring, preparation for standardized testing, and preparation for school entrance examsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Feb 1, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 12, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 25, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 24, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 8, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 27, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Feb 27, 2015NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED—
Feb 26, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 26, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 15, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 15, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2015MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2014NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 27, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 7, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 23, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 19, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 17, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 13, 2013CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 13, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 19, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 20, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2012TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Jun 25, 2012PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 2, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 29, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance