USPTO serial 85636065
OCEAN'S WORLD CUISINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OCEAN'S WORLD CUISINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lorraine Linford
LORRAINE LINFORD SEED IP LAW GROUP PLLC701 5TH AVE STE 5400SEATTLE, WA 98104-7064UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | frozen, prepared and canned foodstuffs, namely, sauces, spreads, dressings, toppings, condiments, spices, oils, vinegars, pasta, rice, noodles, grains, ethnic foods, snack foods, soups, canned or jarred foods, prepared meals, pates, jams, fruits, nuts, olives, candy, cookies, desserts, crackers, and cheeses | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | non-alcoholic beverages, namely, coconut milk, coffees, teas, non-carbonated beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |